I know that we can rethink the world; moreover, I believe that we should.

Henry Giroux and Brad Evans are both public intellectuals very well worth engaging. Please let me know what you think.

I also recommend learning about the Public Intellectual Project and the Histories of Violence Project.

Keith "Maggie" Brown Avatar

Published by

5 responses to “Can We Rethink the World?”

  1. Michael Eldred Avatar

    Yes, we can rethink the world — but it has to go deeper than superficial, left-liberal criticism. We have to get friendly with so-called ‘abstract’ thinking if any depth at all is to be attained, and that’s more than a ‘public intellectual’ project envisages.

    1. Keith Wayne Brown Avatar

      How are you, my friend? It has been ages since I made the trek to the Heidegger Symposium, so I think I have missed a few opportunities to see you.

      I agree, and I hope I would not give the impression that contemplation has not place in my own project. Paulo Freire’s work–the inspiration for Giroux–brings together the abstract thinking of Buber, Jaspers, Ortega, Husserl, and even Heidegger to push forward a notion that educators need to engage students in such a way that abstract thinking does not reduce down merely to verbalism nor active struggle merely to activism.

      Critique and crisis are co-constitutive for possible Existenz. Word & deed must be intwined.

      I am not concerned with reaching 300,000 or 30,000 or even 300 people. I am concerned with the loving struggle between Existenzen who would be their ownmost selves. This public intellectual project has all of the markers to become another form of stupefication. But it also provides a place where abstract ideas get to people who might never encounter them because they do not go to university.

      How do I encourage my young and old friends to get to the depths of thinking if they are not at university? Or if being among the few who enter higher education, keep them from becoming discouraged when they find themselves taught by professionals ever concerned with individual position & professional collegiality before solidarity with humankind let alone concern for Being or the Encompassing?

      Every youth with whom I have shared videos like this wants to read more Heidegger, Jaspers, Ranciere, etc., not less. And do this while they struggle among themselves to formulate a community that honors both the abstract word and the concrete deed.

      I would be interested to know your thoughts on how we might use these new resources at our disposal to encourage the thinking that risks the perils of the depths.

      1. Michael Eldred Avatar

        Thanks, Keith — very nice to hear from you. I haven’t been down North Texas way myself for some time. You were the one to kindly invite me there back in 2001. I enjoy and endorse your commitment & engagement. “How do I encourage my young and old friends to get to the depths of thinking if they are not at university?” I have found that whether listeners are at university or not, I can say unusual thoughts straight from the depths that cut through all the clichés in which this age thinks ad nauseum, including especially the clichés of modern science and its scientific method. Listeners get suddenly energized, shaking off the lethargy induced by the repetitive, soporific clichés ubiquitous in today’s thinking. You don’t have to compromise to get your message through. I agree that Existenz means risking the perils of casting your ownmost self, and this has nothing to do with tweedy, scholarly academic discourse in which each scholar is pandering to accepted clichés for academic validation. As I understand it, ex-sistenz (standing-out) means exposure to the 3D-time-clearing. Such out-standing exposure is the mind itself. To say the very least, this goes against the ever-progressing neuro-scientific reduction of the mind to a clump of very complicated meat in your cranium called the brain.
        Enough for the moment. Te abrazo.

      2. Keith Wayne Brown Avatar

        Yes, we are agreement both philosophically here as well as experientially. I study a lot of popular culture tropes to know what the Ones at Large are up to. I use these as places to begin a conversation that pierces the technoscientism at the heart of neoliberal global capitalism. I’m enjoying my considerations btw of your work on the gainful game.

      3. Michael Eldred Avatar

        You start somewhere with a conversation and move quickly to the pith. The gainful game is an attempt to recast the cliché known as capitalism into another, more adequate cliché that captures its ambivalence. We are all ineluctably players in a game of valuing and estimating each other, things, the sky and earth. The special feature of capitalist economy is that it is mediated by reified value.

Leave a reply to Keith Wayne Brown Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.